|
|
|
|
|
by f1shy
524 days ago
|
|
I seem to be the only one in HN and maybe the world, who worked with decent enough codebases where dynamic typing was no problem at all. Not that I “feel” it was no problem, but there were no bugs found that could be traces down to that. It was not a small codebase. |
|
Sure, Clojure is dynamically typed, but it is also strongly typed. That in practice means that for example Clojurescript when compiling to Javascript enforces those type guarantees, sometimes emitting safer code than even statically typed Typescript cannot.