|
|
|
|
|
by aja12
528 days ago
|
|
From what I've learned reading AdmiralCloudberg's plane crashes analysis [1]: altitude heavily matters in fuel consumption. Jet planes use a lot less fuel at a higher altitude, up to the point that a plane on the verge of running out of fuel at a medium altitude might manage to squeeze in 50 or 100 more miles of flight by climbing 5000 feet, even accounting for the increased fuel consumption during climb.
I guess that correlates with speed as well.
Turbofan engines, on the other hand, are more fuel efficient than jet engines at lower altitudes, hence they remain common for interstate transit. The difference seems to be directly caused by the effect of air "thickness" on the engines. [1] https://admiralcloudberg.medium.com/ |
|
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbofan
Did you mean turboprop?