|
|
|
|
|
by terussell85
523 days ago
|
|
That's a great point and I'm not sure why the memory usage/performance didn't come to mind when writing this. It's probably because, like most JVM related things, it fits into the "good enough" bracket. Most things running in the JVM are definitely
not on the forefront of either CPU or memory performance. I haven't done personal estimates, but your 200 mb + 2*x estimate feels in line to what I'd expect when compared to "memory-tight" languages. |
|