|
|
|
|
|
by ssfrr
519 days ago
|
|
> Doing brute force evaluation on 1024² pixels, the bytecode interpreter takes 5.8 seconds, while the JIT backend takes 182 milliseconds – a 31× speedup! > Note that the speedup is less dramatic with smarter algorithms; brute force doesn't take advantage of interval arithmetic or tape simplification! The optimized rendering implementation in Fidget draws this image in 6 ms using the bytecode interpreter, or 4.6 ms using the JIT backend, so the improvement is only about 25%. I love how this is focused on how the JIT backend is less important with the algorithmic optimizations, and not on how the algorithmic optimizations give a 1000x improvement with bytecode and 40x with JIT. |
|