Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by franktankbank 523 days ago
Agree with you but you're paying for the potential of a sudden burst in traffic planned or unplanned. Going to maintain 5000 servers when you may only use them for some intense period a few hours of a single day during a month. Thats the canonical serverless pitch. I'd hate to develop a new pipeline using serverless as my dev environment.
1 comments

I understand the value of something like this for seasonal businesses / black friday / etc; but for normal companies, how likely is it to _suddenly_ blow up in traffic?

If you are lucky enough to have your company go viral and receive a sudden spike in traffic, will the rest of the infrastructure tolerate it? Will your database accept hundreds of concurrent connections, or will it tip over?

If you need to engineer and test the auto-scaling capabilities of the rest of your infrastructure, is there value in not needing to think about the scaling of your APIs?

These may sound snarky, but they are real questions -- I used to administer ~300k CPU cores, so I have some trouble imagining the use-cases for serverless