|
|
|
|
|
by thiago_fm
532 days ago
|
|
Your comment about primary/high school is incorrect from my point of view. It's only evaluating that time on it being practical for your work (or CS study). There's a lot of value on learning about Geography, History, Biology, the sciences, the social aspect of learning and going to a school and so on. It's hard to observe it after you have done it. It can be possible you feel like you don't remember much, or don't find it useful, but in that scenario, I assume you'd easily be manipulated as you'd have very shallow knowledge about how the world works, despite perhaps having learned "30% more CS" because you just had less high school if it didn't exist. Of course, there are improvements that could be made to the curriculum of schools, but I believe it's the most important learning lessons that set us up for life is there. |
|
Same goes for chemistry for example. Can’t recall much tbh. My point is that primary/high school could be way more efficient.