|
|
|
|
|
by quantadev
534 days ago
|
|
The reason censorship is generally undesirable is because it assumes the person doing the censoring is always correct, and that they're infallible perfect arbiters of truth incapable of letting their political motivations dictate their censorship decisions...which is of course false. They're very often wrong, and always make decisions based on their political leanings, even when it contradicts the evidence. |
|
People regularly say “let me know the full facts, even if they aren’t confirmed.”
This is a common claim from people when it comes to medicine or nutrition, for example.
I think you can acknowledge that people have contradictory impulses - because you’ve experienced it.
All reporting on developing situations will be inaccurate, and yet people want it.
So how would you reconcile this? This need for the best effort information and the need for perfect information?