Obviously not all the advocates share that goal - that's the whole point. Most people would not be OK with intentionally trashing the economy to overturn democracy. It's a camouflaged poison pill policy.
Here are two other Russian proxies achieving totalitarianism. Economically, they're not doing it by racking up pats on the back:
I guess you're saying he's unlike Bolsonaro, Orban, Vucic, Kickl, Trump, Weidel, Le Pen, Duterte and Farage? He's larger-than-life and bombastic. He's overthrown the political order and engineered a downward spiral faster than Maduro's. Putin couldn't ask for more. Argentina has always had problems, but economic suicide is not a disease cure.
Having voiced support for Ukraine doesn't mean much. Even Trump has once or twice.
Argentina has lower inflation, is solving their deficit and is seeing larger than expected economic growth now that Millei is in charge. Maybe he won't fix all the issues, but it seems like things are improving and it is not an "economic suicide".
A 53% poverty rate is economic suicide.[1] Scrambling for food is not economic activity, it's idleness and ruination.
Incidentally, this conversation parallels the one that would follow mass deportations. People complaining of the crashing economy, and the fans of racial cleansing claimimg that it had to be done and that it's a good thing in the long run.
Having massive economic changes will cause short term economic problems. Fixing the inflation will make Argentina better in the future. Just because things are not perfect as quickly as you want does not mean things are not improving.
Advocating for the massive inflation that Argentina had and is now improving is economic suicide. Inflation makes it impossible for average people to save and build wealth. That is economic suicide.
That's a strawman. Using the right economic policies would fix the problem. Argentina had a cold, maybe pneumonia. The right fix was antibiotics, not a bullet to the head.