|
|
|
|
|
|
by UberMouse
528 days ago
|
|
|
That would be true for the 4090, but the 3090 is even more cut down so the 5090 is about 100% faster in rasterization (based on the 4090 being nearly 70% faster than the 3090 and the 5090 being approx 25% faster than the 4090) |
|
|