|
|
|
|
|
by smokedetector1
526 days ago
|
|
> By that logic, no one should build a startup that generates tattoos then? Is this like a law of the universe I'm not aware of, that you must be able to create a profitable startup that generates tattoo ideas? > One of the reasons OpenAI offers APIs, is so you can build startups on top of their tech for average non-technical users. A profitable product will make use of APIs to do something that a user couldn't do almost just as well by just prompting ChatGPT themselves. |
|
That's not what I said. Your question/argument was why build a wrapper when someone can go to ChatGPT and generate a tattoo. You can make that argument for any startup that wraps AI image models. If everyone followed that argument, there would be no startups in this space.
> A profitable product will make use of APIs to do something that a user couldn't do almost just as well by just prompting ChatGPT themselves
Exactly, average users won't know how to steer ChatGPT to generate high quality tattoos. In fact, OP is not even using an OpenAI model, they are using Flux which has no direct consumer interface (from the creators of Flux) and much higher quality image generation.
I wish OP success on his project.