|
|
|
|
|
by llm_trw
526 days ago
|
|
I wish this is something Ai services would understand. You don't charge bases in your teach stack. You charge based on your use case. Tattoos are not something that you get every day so it makes no sense to pretend that your customers will use it like chat gpt. Costing more makes sense since it's a one off transaction that needs to cover overheads. There is a whole raft of services which would seriously benefit from doing the same. Undermind is one I can't justify buying because I do two literature reviews a month at most and have no use for an ongoing subscription I'll forget about. But I'd be happy to pay $5 per search. |
|
The other big benefit of tattoo shops is that they’re a well established type of business that you can sell to, instead of trying to market to consumers. First thing I’d do is buy a list of tattoo parlors and their contact information from InfoGroup/Data Axle/Dun & Bradstreet and start cold contacting them with a free month so they can try it out. I’d monitor the demos and reach out to those who don’t use their free month much to get feedback and refresh the demo period so they can try again. There are conventions where you can sell to the owners and artists en masse too. Google says there are over 20,000 stores in the US which is enough scale to just have a few GPUs to handle base load and autoscale during peak to drive costs down.
I think it can be a very lucrative lifestyle business to someone with good distribution and sales sense, just as long as some VC doesn’t come in and prop up a better resourced competitor.