[lotsofpulp]

Time isn’t a sufficient measure to serve as a proxy for quality parenting.

[ben_w]

But it is a way to limit people to a fixed maximum number of children.

Say it's a requirement for an hour per day per child — no matter how many drugs Musk takes to stay awake, he can't have more than 24 kids.

[satvikpendem]

But, lots of people have many kids thst they don't take care of. Genghis Khan is one such example, apocryphally having so many kids as to constitute 2% of the current Asian population having had him as an ancestor. So I don't quite get your point, there is no maximum.

[ben_w]

The suggestion is to change the rules, so what people currently do is irrelevant.

Genghis Khan set the rules, which is why actually changing them would be very difficult.

[satvikpendem]

The suggestion falls apart under any scrutiny, you can't force anyone to take care of their kids, if they want to, they will, and if they don't, they won't. Genghis Khan is more closer to our current ruleset than anyone currently is to this suggested rule set, he didn't set any rules, he was following the same rules as people currently do, as I mentioned in the previous sentence.

[ben_w]

> The suggestion falls apart under any scrutiny, you can't force anyone to take care of their kids, if they want to, they will, and if they don't, they won't.

I can easily imagine a punishment of forced sterilisation for non-compliance. It wouldn't be the first time human society had that as a punishment.

[satvikpendem]

I mean, if we're talking about totalitarian rather than democratic regimes, then sure, you can sterilize people who don't comply.

[EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK]

I think a lot of people living at that time would constitute 2% of the current Asian population having had him (or her) as an ancestor.