Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dikei 533 days ago
Not a good example, as the de-facto logging interface for Java was SLF4J.

Though I myself prefer Log4J2, as I'm already using Log4J2 as the concrete logging implementation.

1 comments

Why do you prefer Log4j2 over the slf4j api and why over logback as the backend?
I prefer Log4J2 built-in JSON Template Layout to Logback's various JSON output solution.

The API of Log4J2 and SLF4J v2 are similar enough that it does not matter for basic usage, I don't see the benefit of SLF4J in a project that's already using Log4J2.