[MattGaiser]

The tech isn’t too hard.

Getting billions across many different cultures to trust you with money is hard.

They have numerous competitors, from American Express to PayPal. Even crypto could be a competitor. But they have trust problems, are too expensive, or provide no benefit to the purchasers.

Credit cards in general are hard to disrupt as they pay a substantial kickback to the people who would otherwise be adopters of a new technology.

As a high income, technologically savvy, globally mobile person, I am who a payment company would need to flip to drive broad global payment adoption. Unfortunately for them, credit cards are enormously valuable to me as is due to points and perks.

[nradov]

The legal compliance issues are probably just as hard as establishing trust.

[nothercastle]

The trust is also hard because it are selling at 30-100 year product. If your company goes bankrupt than they buyer might be forced to spend a lot of money replacing the elevator. Think fiskar electric cars except much more expensive and harder to replace.

[MattGaiser]

No, as the alternatives are in the market, so they have solved the compliance issues (sufficiently at least to avoid getting shut down). It is simply that they cannot get customers onboard.

[abhayhegde]

In other words, excessive regulation makes the trustworthiness hard.

[MattGaiser]

How does excess regulation keep PayPal from being a payment alternative? People can currently use PayPal to do business if they wish. You could take PayPal transfers at a grocery store.

There is a case for regulation blocking crypto in some areas, but certainly not all and it still has yet to find meaningful traction as a payment processing mechanism.

[Ekaros]

With credit cards it is more so lack of regulation. With low enough caps on fees it is lot less of an problem. Still should mandate them to serve all customers. And only kick them out after certain fraud threshold.