|
|
|
|
|
|
by lynnah
534 days ago
|
|
|
Very poor. Sloppy. Like ‘hey this tv drama show exists and is my supporting evidence…’ what?
The economist, too. Weird. Usually better quality overall. This is just weirdly written like a 12 yo that’s been on the facebooks reading anti-boomer propaganda too long. Also, someone needs to get laid and smoke a joint. I’m
not even joking. Feel bad for the kid. But I don’t see a byline on this, so I’m not sure who. |
|
|
The Economist doesn't use bylines for their articles: https://medium.economist.com/why-are-the-economists-writers-...