|
|
|
|
|
by grecy
529 days ago
|
|
It seems like Americans have a knack for coming up with the most convoluted ways of accessing healthcare that are still expensive and inconvenient. Your idea still require paying out of pocket, requires taking unpaid time off work, flights, relying on the healthcare system of a foreign country and more. That is the worst possible "healthcare" situation I can imagine. Dozens of countries have shown you pay a lot less and get much better outcomes [1] when you just provide healthcare to everyone all the time, the same way high school, roads and street lights are provided. Why wouldn't you want that? Why on earth would you think flying to some foreign country is a better solution? [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Life_expectancy_vs_heal... |
|
Medical tourism is alive and well even within Europe [1]. And an entire genre of concierge medicine in America caters to rich Europeans (alongside rich Middle Easterners and Asians).
[1] https://www.magazine.medicaltourism.com/article/visegrad-cou...