|
|
|
|
|
|
by p1esk
534 days ago
|
|
|
they are designed to elucidate the author's thought process - not the reader's learning process No, it’s exactly the opposite: when I write papers I follow a rigid template of what a reader (reviewer) expects to see. Abstract, intro, prior/related work, main claim or result, experiments supporting the claim, conclusion, citations. There’s no room or expectation to explain any of the thought process that led to the claim or discovery. Vast majority of papers follow this template. |
|
|