[exceptione]

What I miss in the paper is any accuracy figure for glucose sensing. If this is an alternative to needles, how would the measurements compare? That is the first question one should ask.

I fear we can assume that, although the approach might be novel, it can't replace needles for accurate measurement. But maybe I am overlooking the performance comparison.

[croes]

Seems like it's nowhere near usable for glucose sensing

https://chaos.social/@jaseg/113777015012964743

[DavideNL]

Yea, it might perhaps be described more detailed in the mentioned paper (i haven't checked it yet.):

https://www.nature.com/articles/s44172-024-00194-4

EDIT: No, i don't think it's mentioned...

[bobmcnamara]

They claim 90-some percent