Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rrr_oh_man 529 days ago
I don’t think anyone who upvoted this has read more than one sentence of this paper.
2 comments

It’s interesting even if not true or correct.

You could also choose to enrich the discussion by elaborating on why you think this is worthless instead.

I have a hard time giving worth to a paper whose first sentence fails to spell intelligence correctly.
In a mathematical conversation, someone suggested to Grothendieck that they should consider a particular prime number. “You mean an actual number?” Grothendieck asked. The other person replied, yes, an actual prime number. Grothendieck suggested, “All right, take 57.”

Might I suggest Postel's Law?

This paper has been available for a few weeks, and I wrote an article [1] exploring how to apply its inner workings to the design of multi-agent systems. If you can design "reasoning" at the model level, you can also design "reasoning" in larger, more complex systems using the same principles.

https://melvintercan.com/p/lessons-from-reasoning-designing