|
|
|
|
|
|
by jitl
530 days ago
|
|
|
I think it’s targeted at [many -> one] database consolidation versus Postgres replication which is more suited for [one -> one]. I’m sure you can do [many -> one] with just Postgres and some shenanigans but it’s probably quite Rube Goldberg. Also in Postgres <16 you can’t replica of replica, using a CDC tool to pipe data around you don’t have that restriction. |
|
|