|
|
|
|
|
by motorest
539 days ago
|
|
> The feds recently convicted a guy by arguing a piece of metal (basically a metal business card) with a drawing of a machine gun conversion device on, as having sold machine guns. I feel you're grossly and purposely misrepresenting the case. The case you're referring to was over unregistered machine-gun conversion devices. The guy was selling them online and was caught with over a thousand machine-gun conversion kits. What makes this case noteworthy is the dissimulated way kits were being marketed and sold, such as bottle openers, pen holders, or business cards. The guy also marketed his machine-gun conversion kits as an AR-related device and "the parts ATF wishes never existed". I believe you are well-aware of this fact. Yet, you chose to misrepresent it. |
|
It's a metal business card shape with a drawing of the parts of a lightning link on it, that the state admitted didn't even function as one when dremmeled out using the blueprint. Even if you cut into the shapes, ATF could not get it to induce automatic fire. This is primarily a first amendment case and will get overturned as soon as a non-lukewarm IQ judge sees it. It's inevitable.