| > There has been very little change in the actual electronics and mechanical engineering of robotics. So it's no surprise that the traditional hardware leaders like Kuka and ABB are not seeing massive gains so far. Perhaps I wasn't explicit enough about the argument I was trying to make. Revenue in business is about selling price multiplied by sales volumes, and I'm not sure factory robot sales volumes are big enough to 'drive future growth' for nvidia. According to [1] there were 553,000 robots installed in factories in 2023. Even if every single one of those half a million robots needed a $2000 GPU that's only $1.1 billion in revenue. Meanwhile nvidia had revenue of 26 billion in 2023, and 61 billion in 2024. Many of those robots will be doing basic, routine things that don't need complex vision systems. And 54% of those half a billion robot arms were sold in China - sanctions [2] mean nvidia can't export even the 4090 to China, let alone anything more expensive. Machine vision models are considered 'huge' if they reach half a gigabyte - industrial robots might not need the huge GPUs that LLMs call for. So it's not clear nvidia can increase the price per GPU to compensate for the limited sales volumes. If nvidia wants robotics to 'drive future growth' they need a bigger market than just factory automation. [1] https://ifr.org/img/worldrobotics/2023_WR_extended_version.p...
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/19/china_biden_ai/ |
https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1h1i1z1/...