| Up to a point they could simply deny that AI couldn't do these things. This allowed them to count users as people for advertising revenue. This industry has long suffered from fraud, but because not enough information is generally provided its been an uphill battle given the opaqueness of the numbers. With GPT's release they can no longer deny this, it was publicly available and people could easily engage so there was no longer any doubt. Ad revenue has shrunk proportionally over time requiring ever more private information to be collected to be considered valuable. This is how surveillance capitalism works. Now onto the question of how this can make them money? Instead of just static advertisements, imagine a bot that would occasionally insert (sponsor) into a conversation. If you sell it like that, they can charge more for the same slots, while mining the conversations for the valuable dossier elements that bring in a premium. Inevitably though, this is a dead business model. When everyone knows everything about anyone, and its commonly available, there is nowhere else to go. That kind of society also ends up causing abuses because of false reasoning that normally accompanies permanent records. People don't change, they are exactly the same whether they are 35 or 8. Obviously that last statement is not true because people have the capability to grow with time, but that doesn't prevent others from using it as a coercive element to their own benefit. An age of evil awaits, and such systems continue until the destructive dynamics turn inwards destroying itself, chaotically. |