|
|
|
|
|
|
by realusername
530 days ago
|
|
|
There's a big difference between Apple's review process which I would qualify as unnecessary and unfair and Linux's review process which is necessary to produce high quality software. But it's true that they could at least start by publishing the source code, even if they don't contribute directly. As for the ABI, I also agree, this would just make the situation worse. |
|
|
Why? I don't see how that follows. It might be likely to produce better software simply by having experienced kernel devs review the code, but it's definitely not necessary.