[vkou]

The meat of the argument of the post was a restatement of the past three posts that I've made. I did lead with the argument, in somewhat less detail.

[lolinder]

No, you didn't, you led with this:

> In 2024, this isn't fact, it's just baseless conspiracy.

> All evidence has ended up pointing to bush meat contamination.

This isn't science communication, it's a condescending rebuke.

That said, I'm done here. Thanks for clarifying in the end, and happy new year!