[mmooss]

You really have no external problems with neighbors? People leaving trash outside the dumpster? All the other externalities of life near other people?

Where is this wonderful neighborhood? :)

> pick through the piles of trash and shit every time I leave my home

There are piles of trash and shit? Wow. Why don't you use your freedom and move?

> massive negative externalities they are causing are a result of them being homeless.

Words like "piles" and "massive" don't increase the evidence or reason; they aren't an argument.

Your argument is that you can't think of a solution, so you'll just abuse these people. Then your preferences are creating a massive externality. The people without homes aren't causing you to be arrested.

[s17n]

> People leaving trash outside the dumpster?

Have you ever actually lived in a city?

> There are piles of trash and shit? Wow. Why don't you use your freedom and move?

I'm doing just that, moving to another neighborhood on Feb 1.

> Your argument is that you can't think of a solution, so you'll just abuse these people.

Like I said elsewhere in this thread: I think the need of the thousands of residents of the neighborhood to have livable streets outweigh whatever concern you might have about the well being of a few destructive individuals.

[mmooss]

I've lived in many cities. I don't think I've ever lived someplace without a few troublesome, housed, neighbors - including those who left their trash outside the dumpster!

> the need of the thousands of residents of the neighborhood to have livable streets outweigh whatever concern you might have about the well being of a few destructive individuals.

It's their rights and freedom, and that applies to everyone. Other people can't outweigh them - rights are not subject to majority rules, that is the point of having rights.

'Liveable' is too loose a standard. Actual harm would be meaningful.