|
|
|
|
|
|
by unwise-exe
531 days ago
|
|
|
<< To do so, court records reveal, the insurers have turned to a coterie of psychiatrists and have continued relying on them even after one or more of their decisions have been criticized or overturned in court. >> ...ok? Is ProPublica seriously trying to assert that they should be barred after a single decision ("one or more" includes "one") has been criticized ("criticized or overturned" includes "criticized but upheld")? |
|
|