|
|
|
|
|
by quasse
528 days ago
|
|
> For your example about single payer, with that scheme costs will likely be much lower but on the flip side, we also would not get immediate access to care (that is you can't attend a doctors appt within 72 hrs of scheduling) I am curious, why is this accepted as a "given" of single payer health care? I know it's a a problem in Canada and Britain, but those systems seem to be victims of something between neglect and outright political sabotage. As a side note, my partner is currently about half way through a two month wait to see her GP in the good old US of A (on United Health Care). I would love to only have to wait a few days. |
|