[anonytrary]

I'm not sure what it's called (abstraction vs. indirection) but I dislike when everything needs a class/object with some odd combination of curried functions. Some programming languages force this on you more than others I think? As a contrived example "StringManager.SlicingManager.sliceStringMaker(0)(24)(myStr)", I've seen code that reminds me of this and wonder why anyone uses a language where this not only an acceptable idiom, but a preferred one.

[Jaxan]

In Haskell gMaker(0)(24)(myStr) and gMaker(0, 24, myStr) would have the same syntax, namely gMaker 0 24 myStr. So that solves the issue.