|
|
|
|
|
|
by GuB-42
542 days ago
|
|
|
> This is just typical for science "journalism". This one is not that bad. First, and it is the most important point, it links to the actual studies. So many articles don't do that... Maybe some journalists should be told that unlike paper, the web has hyperlinks, but here, the author knows. More than that, the article doesn't mentions a single study, and is cautious regarding potential causation. The article title doesn't explicitly mention causation, just that "taxi drivers offer a clue". It is clickbait, but clicks is how they get paid, as mainstream journalists, they don't really have a choice. As a mainstream news article I'd give it a 9/10. It has sources, makes an effort that goes beyond interpreting a single paper, and talks about shortcomings. |
|
|