|
|
|
|
|
by Otternonsenz
537 days ago
|
|
Because a person might be willing: -to directly support artists with buying the albums or songs at full price, rather than letting Spotify barely pay artists anything for their music (especially independent ones without industry connections) -knowing you own your library and that once you’ve purchased media, there is nothing to take it away other than the sands of time taking back its silicate -one does not need unlimited access to songs they will never hear, especially when natural discoverability on Spotify is so so versus trawling through sites like Bandcamp, Earmilk, RCRDLBL (I know it doesn’t exist anymore), or other places where new artists show their work in a way that Spotify doesn’t provide |
|
You can't post an open source project on this site without half the thread speculating that you're a grifting sociopath. <1% are going to pay for music on here.