[barakm]

Literally `jj undo`

There's a whole operation log (`jj op log`), as another sequence of actions, and you can undo them. It gets crazier from there, but I've also been enjoying jujutsu lately and I had to RTFM a good couple of times to get comfortable with it.

[stouset]

Also cool: jujutsu remembers every previous state of all your changes. So you make some edits, run `jj status` (or anything), and keep working.

Two hours later you realize your experiment is a total failure and you wish you had the half-working changes from earlier. You don’t need to have actively commited anything, it’s all in the obsolte log and you can retrieve it.

I want to repeat that last bit. Unlike git, there was no point where you needed to finalize your changes with a commit in order for them to be persisted and archived for later retrieval.

[xdfgh1112]

You can even undo operations that aren't the most recent one.

[corytheboyd]

Huh this comment thread may have convinced me to finally try it. I’m comfortable with git, and fixing mistakes in git, but not being able to trivially reverse any and every transaction is annoying.

[swaits]

I made a mess of a jj repo recently. A big mess. Ran `jj op log`, found the operation I wanted, and just `jj restore`d my way back to that exact prior state. Then started what I was planning afresh and got it right. Felt magical.

And I didn't have to learn anything like the hell of git refs. The UI is self-explanatory as long as you know the feature exists.

Another very nice thing is that conflicts aren't roadblocks. They're legit changes, first-class jj citizens. So, when I do something that ends in a conflict, I can just move over to a different change, do the work I'm already trying to do, and then go back and resolve the conflict when I want.

[corytheboyd]

Ah yes, I’ve heard it makes the hell of huge conflict ridden rebases a bit less annoying. Always wished I could just get to the end of the rebase to see it all in context, _then_ resolve conflicts, but with the option to resolve the obvious ones along the way too.

[stouset]

Yep, this was the thing that encouraged me to look at jj. I am so done with rebases where I’m stuck in some meta-state where I need to figure out exactly what needs to be done—linearly, right now, and without making any mistakes—but all the regular tooling to jump around and explore is unavailable until I’m finished with the whole thing.

I would honestly use jj for just this even if that was all it offered.

[barakm]

I hear ya. I've done some crazy things with `git reflog` (which I always pronounce git re-flog instead of ref-log) but it is not fun.

There's the usual cognitive shift, and in my case a bit of a best-practice shift I had to go through to get comfortable with `jj` -- specifically, keeping the repo directory pristine (and putting my temp output in a git-ignored dir, or outside the repo) because /everything/ is tracked. Flip side being, I've forgotten to `git add` new files at least a few times a year, and now that won't be an issue.

But yeah, can highly recommend, and I'm excited to start to jump between multiple open branches^Wbookmarks at will and learn more about the intricacies of conflict management (and the original link is a good glimpse at that!)

[stavros]

Are new files tracked by default? If I forget to ignore a bunch of build outputs, will that make my repo huge immediately?

[stouset]

There’s a configurable cap on max file size to auto-add, IIRC. It defaults to something “reasonable”.

If you do somehow add a terabyte of small files by accident, it’s still just git under the hood so you can make sure nothing active points at them and GC them.

[stavros]

I'm thinking of something like node_modules, sounds like I'll need to not forget.