|
|
|
|
|
by lbolla
5080 days ago
|
|
I agree with your prediction, but it scares me that a medium that should make communications easier will actually put more barriers between ages. I already do not understand SMS spelling: in 50 years, probably a 30 years old person will not understand things written by a 15 years old person. Conservatism in schools has the advantage that we can still read Shakespeare (or Dante) without translation. Languages that change too quickly defy their own purpose (i.e. being a common ground for people to communicate). |
|
Conservatism isn't inherently bad, and innovation for its own sake is idiotic.
Note that, for Shakespeare at least, even though one can still understand the main meaning of the text, a lot of puns and cultural references are lost to the modern reader (lest he's a specialized literature scholar)...