|
|
|
|
|
by upghost
545 days ago
|
|
It's so much worse than you could possibly imagine. I worked for a healthcare startup working on patient enrollment for clinical oncology trials. The challenges are amazing. Quite frankly it wouldn't matter if the data were in plaintext. The diagnostic codes vary between providers, the semantic understanding of the diagnostic information has different meanings between providers, electronic health records are a mess, things are written entirely in natural language rather than some kind of data structure. Anyone who's worked in healthcare software can tell you way more horror stories. I do hope that LLMs can help straighten some of it out but anyone whos done healthcare software, the problems are not technical, they are quite human. That being said one bright spot is we've (my colleagues, not me) made a huge step forward using category theory and Prolog to discover the provably optimal 3+3 clinical oncology dose escalation trial protocol[1]. David gave a great presentation on it at the Scryer Prolog meetup[2] in Vienna. It's kind of amazing how in the dark ages we are with medicine. Even though this is the first EXECUTABLE/PROGRAMMABLE SPEC for a 3+3 cancer trial, he is still fighting to convince his medical colleagues and hospital administrators that this is the optimal trial because -- surprise -- they don't speak software (or statistics). [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08334 [2]: https://www.digitalaustria.gv.at/eng/insights/Digital-Austri... |
|