|
|
|
|
|
by openrisk
544 days ago
|
|
Writing evolved after visual imagery to solve the poor ability of visuals to express abstractions. It too is based on imagery, thats what script is after all, but leverages the emergent social pattern of literacy to convey highly encoded information. This invention (that we now take for granted) has been so exalted in the minds of earlier generations that they would go to extremes to banish imagery (iconoclasts etc.) It takes its most extreme form in mathematical script: concise expression of the most abstract ideas. Commingling imagery and text has its many uses of course: try describing a graph or diagram or a real scene using text only. But for other purposes (literature) its a distraction that forces the brain to switch mode and diminishes the experience. |
|
Yet one thing that these minimalistic text-based interfaces are terrible for is rendering mathematical notation.
> But for other purposes (literature) its a distraction that forces the brain to switch mode and diminishes the experience.
Yet we do not (typically) consume literature in a monospace, typographically impoverished form.