|
|
|
|
|
by gerdesj
537 days ago
|
|
Perhaps the real issue is that learning takes time and that there may not be a shortcut. I'll grant you that argument's analogue was complete wank when comparing say the horse and cart to a modern car. However, we are not comparing cars to horses but computers to a human. I do want "AI" to work. I am not a luddite. The current efforts that I've tried are not very good. On the surface they offer a lot but very quickly the lustre comes off very quickly. (1) How often do you find yourself arguing with someone about a "fact"? Your fact may be fiction for someone else. (2) LLMs cannot reason A next token guesser does not think. I wish you all the best. Rome was not burned down within a day! I can sit down with you and discuss ideas about what constitutes truth and cobblers (rubbish/false). I have indicated via parenthesis (brackets in en_GB) another way to describe something and you will probably get that but I doubt that your programme will. |
|