[pdimitar]

`just` is 90% similar to `make` in syntax, only it has 100x less foot guns. :)

Also I'll never understand the appeal of "not having to install a tool". We're not in the 1980s anymore when that was an actual chore. You run a command, the tool is there (including in CI/CD), boom, done. What am I missing here?

The advantages you list are flimsy at best.

[maccard]

Bootstrapping can be painful in some languages or frameworks. Not everyone is running containerised builds where there are ephemeral environments that you just install a tool (and pay the 30+ second cost per build to run apt-get update). There’s certainly value in having a front door entry point. But I think it should be a shell script, not a makefile.

[pdimitar]

Yes to your last. Either sh/bash script or a precompiled Golang program. If installing a tool is really such a problem then having a precompiled strongly typed program doing various tasks should be a no-brainer.

I started openly hating `make` because I re-learned its specifics and quirks several times over the course of 10-ish years and then figured that I want to learn stuff with a staying power in my brain. I don't use `make` every work day so eventually any quirks disappear -- that's how our brains work.

So that's why I learned most of `just` and it hasn't betrayed me so far, not once. Though I did write a few Elixir and Golang programs for running various tasks in production environment, too.