[joshstrange]

Agreed, at best they could “make” is the cost of the subscription minus Spotify’s fee in this system. So I put $10 in and get $7 out (making up numbers). For money laundering it could make sense but I agree, nothing else makes much sense.

[deltaknight]

See my comment as a sibling to yours for a link, but Matt Levine made a post about how the pooling seems to work at Spotify. All the subscription money is pooled together, and all listening hours are pooled together. Artists are paid out at the ratios of everybody’s listening hours pool, not just each individual subscriber.

This means what individuals pay doesn’t matter at all to the artists they listen to. All you need to do is rack up a lot of listening hours, to have an outsized impact on the resultant listening hours pool. Then if enough other subscribers barely listen to any music, you can earn more than the $10 you put in.

[fragmede]

Free listeners listen to ads which turns into dollars.

here's an industry blog report on the problem:

https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/great-big-spotify-sca...

[Raed667]

easy, make the ad-money pool different from the subscription money pool