[Terr_]

> response time

Imagine you take an extraordinarily smart person, and put them on a fast spaceship that causes time dilation.

Does that mean that they are stupider while in transit, and they regain their intelligence when it slows down?

[zoky]

Who is a better free-thrower, someone who can hit 20 free throws per minute on Earth, or the same thrower who logged 20 million free throws in the apparent two years he was gone but comes back ready for retirement?

[Earw0rm]

No, because intelligence is relative to your local context.

[Terr_]

Why should one kind of phenomenon which slows down performance on the test be given a special "you're more intelligent than you seem" exception, but not others?

If we are required to break the seal on the black-box and investigate the exactly how the agent is operating in order to judge its "intelligence"... Doesn't that kinda ruin the up-thread stuff about judging with equations?

[Earw0rm]

The point is that the wall-clock measuring the test-taker's performance should be in the same context as the test-taker.

They will still complete the task in 70 local minutes, even if that's eighty of an outside observer's.