[nopinsight]

One possibility is that it may not yet have sufficient experience and real-world feedback for resolving coding issues in professional repos, as this involves multiple steps and very diverse actions (or branching factor, in AI terms). They have committed to not training on API usage, which limits their ability to directly acquire training data from it. However, their upcoming agentic efforts may address this gap in training data.

[timabdulla]

Right, but the branching factor increases exponentially with the scope of the work.

I think it's obvious that they've cracked the formula for solving well-defined, small-in-scope problems at a superhuman level. That's an amazing thing.

To me, it's less obvious that this implies that they will in short order with just more training data be able to solve ambiguous, large-in-scope problems at even just a skilled human level.

There are far more paths to consider, much more context to use, and in an RL setting, the rewards are much more ambiguously defined.

[nopinsight]

Their reasoning models can learn from procedures and methods, which generalize far better than data. Software tasks are diverse but most tasks are still fairly limited in scope. Novel tasks might remain challenging for these models, as they do for humans.

That said, o3 might still lack some kind of interaction intelligence that’s hard to learn. We’ll see.