|
|
|
|
|
by PaulHoule
544 days ago
|
|
He's a provocateur. The Economist runs articles that are skeptical of transgenderism, so does The New York Times. That's one thing. Singal seeks out specific members of the transgender community to harass. His aim, I think, is to provoke transgender people into doing stupid things like making death threats so he can turn around and write articles on another platform about the death threats he gets. Like a schoolyard bully he has one eye on the rules and is careful to not quite cross the line that he gets kicked out. He confuses people by crossing over activities on different platforms, like if you see that blog post he does not show all of the things that he did to provoke people. On X, for instance, he calls for people to dogpile on people at Bluesky, etc. First I heard about him there were people on Mastodon who said people were leaving Bluesky because Singal hadn't been kicked out. I did see his Bluesky and it was exactly what I expected and I muted him the same way I mute anybody who blames their problems on cis people. |
|
No he doesn't. In some of his work, he reports on what prominent voices of that community have to say. Like any journalist. And sometimes, he responds when they lie about what he's written in his articles, or exhibit abusive behaviors against others.
Here's one example: https://jessesingal.substack.com/p/on-alejandra-caraballo-vs...
Now, you might frame this as Singal "harassing" Caraballo, but if you look at what he's written, he's reporting on Caraballo who is the one actually harassing and doxxing.
There are some very, very toxic figures in that community, and the only reason they started to come after Singal is that his journalism challenges their dogma.