Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 15155 541 days ago
Because the object you are receiving a signal from is further, thus necessitating more sensitive receiving equipment that couldn't have existed in the past?
1 comments

I don’t buy that premise at all.
Superconducting detectors and materials science have obviously advanced leaps and bounds in the last 30 years: it's really not up for debate or a premise that can be "bought."