[greggsy]

One of my own pet peeves in Forged In Fire was that every contestant would submit Damascus (-style) blades for their final showdowns. It just wasn’t necessary and often just looked trashy.

As a secondary nitpick, the term is perfectly acceptable for the process commonly used today. As you’ve already mentioned - the original process has been lost to time, so no one actually makes it.

[mmcdermott]

> One of my own pet peeves in Forged In Fire was that every contestant would submit Damascus (-style) blades for their final showdowns. It just wasn’t necessary and often just looked trashy.

Agreed. There was a much smaller emphasis on Damascus steel in early seasons. If you go back and rewatch you can see the frequency pick up as they praised and required Damascus more and more.

[zdragnar]

I think part of the reason is just the visual factor- TV screens don't do a particularly good job of showing off solid colored blades compared to how they look in person.

On top of that, I believe it is easier to run into problems with delamination, or that a small flaw can more easily be a larger problem.

If anything, it seems like an added challenge to demonstrate that you can do it, as a way to distinguish the blade in the final judging if it performed similarly to the others.

Ultimately, though, it's still just showmanship and not an actual indication of the quality of the blade itself. It's a TV show, after all.