|
|
|
|
|
by Joker_vD
544 days ago
|
|
> When your brand evolves to a different shade of green This is such a funny line to read. I just can't help but imagine a brand like a small bulbasaur that evolves into big, strong venosaur which of course involves changing its shade of green. > An interesting question would be: "how much does it matter that the visual language is consistent across a company's assets?" An even more interesting question would be "if we keep changing the colours/shapes/general theme/etc. of our brand's logos every nine months or so, do they even matter, really?" My suspicion is that the answer is "no, not really, that's why we can afford to meddle with them since it's a mostly consequence-free environment, and it distracts busybodies from breaking some actually important aspect of the business". |
|
Facebook updated their main brand blue and other colors in 2023, partly for accessibility: https://design.facebook.com/stories/redefining-facebooks-bra...
Wise also had a rebranding with accessibility in mind: https://the-brandidentity.com/interview/how-the-ragged-edge-...
Figma recently changed their colors too: https://www.figma.com/blog/figma-on-figma-evolving-our-visua...
It won't be just a single color either, but a whole palette for them. It's not practical to do a search/replace of color hexes across all designs and code, because it can depend on context which color is appropriate to use where, especially for accessibility.
It's also the norm I would say for startups and small companies to launch with minimal/good-enough branding (often with poor color contrast for the main brand colors because people love bright colors on white), and then they change/refine it later when it's more important.
Not saying you need design tokens at all stages, but brands do evolve.