|
|
|
|
|
by throw0101c
542 days ago
|
|
An interesting take on the dilemma between the two 'sides': > You see the problem. If you include the filioque, you fight the Arians in the West while inadvertently supporting the Sabellians in the East. But if you exclude it, you fight the Sabellians while inadvertently supporting the Arians. At its heart, the filioque is really a linguistic debate, not a theological one. * https://old.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/comments/68hb00/eli5_th... (I don't know about the intricacies/subtleties enough to know how 'technically accurate' the above assessment is.) |
|
I have heard some fairly convincing (to a lay person) discussion between orthodox and catholic scholars that the filioque is potentially resolvable as a linguistic problem yes. But it's not worth really pursuing without a solution for the bigger issue of papal primacy. I don't know anyone who claims to have a viable path to reconciliation there. Plus, you know, the thousand years of mutual distrust and enmity.