|
|
|
|
|
by mitthrowaway2
545 days ago
|
|
The saddle, the stirrup, the horseshoe, the wagon, the plough, and the drawbar all enhanced the productivity of horses and we only ended up employing more of them. Then the steam engine and internal combustion engine came around and work horses all but disappeared. There's no economic law that says a new productivity-enhancing programming tool is always a stirrup and never a steam engine. |
|
All the tools that are stirrups were used "by the horse" (you get what I mean); that implies to me that so long as the AI tools are used by the programmers (what we've currently got), they're stirrups.
The steam engines were used by the people "employing the horse" - ala, "people don't buy drills they buy holes" (people don't employ horses, they move stuff) - so that's what to look for to see what's a steam engine.
IMHO, as long as all this is "telling the computer what to do", it's stirrups, because that's what we've been doing. If it becomes something else, then maybe it's a steam engine.
And, to repeat - thank you for this point, it's an excellent one, and provides some good language for talking about it.