|
|
|
|
|
by manquer
545 days ago
|
|
It doesn’t have to understand anything, none of these demonstrate reasoning or understanding. All these models have just “seen” enough videos of all those things to build a probability distribution to predict the next step. This is not bad, or make it inherently dumb, a major component of human intelligence is built on similar strategies.
I couldn’t tell what grammatical rules are broken in text or what physical rules in a photograph but can tell it is wrong using the same methods . Inference can take it far with large enough data sets, but sooner or later without reasoning you will hit a ceiling . This is true for humans as well, plenty of people go far in life with just memorization and replication do a lot of jobs fairly competently, but not in everything. Reasoning is essential for higher order functions and transformers is not the path for that |
|