[pid-1]

I've brought MS Copilot licenses for my company in ~ February 2023. They were sold in a yearly commitment and offered no trials. A bad deal, but I was afraid of missing out AI productivity gains.

I'm definitely not renewing those. Times are hard and the value provided does not justify the cost.

I wonder how many companies will do the same.

[syntaxing]

I recently personally resubscribed to copilot after cancelling my subscription a couple months ago since it was not providing value. But now with the new/beta “Edit” mode and being able to specify to use o1, o1 mini, and sonnet 3.5, the $10 a month feels a lot more worth it. The edit mode has outperformed aider for me.

[pid-1]

Sorry, I think we are talking about different stuff.

I was referring to Copilot for M365, which costs 30 USD / month and targets biz users.

Github Copilot is definitely worth it.

[syntaxing]

Oh wow, I definitely misunderstood, all the “Copilot” usage by MS/Github got me mixed up

[Bluecobra]

I've found Copliot to be really good at generating funny memes and haikus for specific issues/tasks where I work. The productivity gains come from me not having to use Photoshop and have more time to browse websites like this one.

[sebazzz]

In some cases it is useful, like in Excel where it can generate formulas or describe an approach to a problem. Not different than GH Copilot. The same for MS Power Automate editor AI assistent.

But in other cases like Word or Outlook it is just a louzy summarizer and does not have much added value.

[pid-1]

That's surprising. I haven't met a single user who found Copilot useful in Excel.

I've found some that enjoyed using it a "smart auto complete" both in Word and Outlook, however.

Most of my users are financial analysts.

[ellisv]

Interesting because I pay for Copilot and Supermaven, although most of my coworkers don't. To be fair, it was twisting their arms to get them to use linters, formatters, and other tools so I think asking them to use AI auto-complete is a bit much right now.