[__mharrison__]

LLMs are decent at Pandas.

I say "decent" because most of the available training data for Pandas does things in a naive way.

OTOH, they are horrible at Polars. (I figure this is mostly a lack of training data.)

[disgruntledphd2]

> I say "decent" because most of the available training data for Pandas does things in a naive way.

They're around the level of the median user, which is pretty bad as pandas is a big and complicated API with many different approaches available (as is base R, in case people think I'm just hating on pandas).