[derektank]

Informative article! I did have a question about this passage though.

"It seems that he is spending a lot of his time & effort on maintaining his hair (huge kudos for admitting that!). If his body was functioning like an 18-year old he should not need to do that. If Bryan really set back his true aging clock he probably would not be battling with ongoing hair loss (as he most likely did not battle hair loss 20 years prior), or at least it would stop (which does not seem to be the case)."

Is this true? I suppose it's a question of what one defines as aging but I thought male pattern baldness resulted from hair follicles physically shrinking in response to exposure to androgens. That's a very different process than an accumulation of senescent / poorly differentiated cells, which is what I have always heard described as the key hallmark of aging

[123yawaworht456]

it's kind of bullshit because plenty of guys lose some/most of their hair in their teens